Search
   
 
 
 
 
   
 
   
 
   
  December 7, 2004
   
 

I.  Preface

In August 2004, a group of animal welfare industry leaders from across the nation convened at Asilomar Conference Grounds in Pacific Grove, California for the purpose of building bridges across varying philosophies, developing relationships, and creating goals focused on significantly reducing the euthanasia of healthy and treatable companion animals in the United States. 

Through hard work, lively discussion, and brainstorming, a common vision for the future was adopted.  The leadership of the following organizations participated in the original, and/or subsequent meetings, and were involved in the drafting of the Asilomar Accords:

 
 Martha Armstrong  The Humane Society of the United States
 Richard Avanzino  Maddie's Fund
 Pamela Burns  Hawaiian Humane Society & The National Council on Pet Population Study &  Policy
 Mark Byers  Spanish Fork Animal Control (UT) & the National Animal Control Association  (NACA)
 Gregory Castle  Best Friends Animal Society
 Perry Fina  North Shore Animal League and The Pet Savers Foundation
 Mark Goldstein, D.V.M.  San Diego Humane Society and SPCA
 Belinda Lewis  Fort Wayne Animal Care & Control
 Dave Loftus  Pet-Ark
 Jane McCall  Dubuque Humane Society
 Jan McHugh-Smith  Humane Society of Boulder Valley
 Steven McHugh  Unison Business Development
 Nancy McKenney  Humane Society for Seattle/King County
 Dan Morrison  Southeast Area Animal Control Authority
 Michael Mountain  Best Friends Animal Society
 John Nagy  Dumb Friends League & the Society of Animal Welfare Administrators (SAWA)
 Cheryl Naumann  Arizona Humane Society
 Robert Rohde  Dumb Friends League
 Edwin Sayres  American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
 John Snyder  The Humane Society of the United States
 Karen Terpstra  Pasadena Humane Society & SPCA
 Gary Tiscornia  SPCA of Monterey County & the Society of Animal Welfare Administrators  (SAWA)
 Marie Belew Wheatley  American Humane Association
 

II.  Guiding Principles

1. The mission of those involved in creating the Asilomar Accords is to work together to save the lives of all healthy and treatable companion animals.

2. We recognize that all stakeholders in the animal welfare community have a passion for and are dedicated to the mutual goal of saving animals' lives.

3. We acknowledge that the euthanasia of healthy and treatable animals is the sad responsibility of some animal welfare organizations, which neither desired nor sought this task.  We believe that the euthanasia of healthy and treatable animals is a community-wide problem requiring community-based solutions.  We also recognize that animal welfare organizations can be leaders in bringing about a change in social and other factors that result in the euthanasia of healthy and treatable animals, including the compounding problems of some pet owners'/guardians' failure to spay and neuter; properly socialize and train; be tolerant of; provide veterinary care to; or take responsibility for companion animals. 

4. We, as animal welfare stakeholders, agree to foster a mutual respect for one another.  When discussing differences of policy and opinion, either publicly or within and among our own agencies, we agree to refrain from denigrating or speaking ill of one another.  We will also encourage those other individuals and organizations in our sphere of influence to do the same.

5. We encourage all communities to embrace the vision and spirit of these Accords, while acknowledging that differences exist between various communities and geographic regions of the country. 

6. We encourage the creation of local "community coalitions" consisting of a variety of organizations (e.g., governmental animal control agencies, nonprofit shelters, grassroots foster care providers, feral cat groups, funders and veterinary associations) for the purpose of saving the lives of healthy and treatable animals.  We are committed to the belief that no one organization or type of organization can achieve this goal alone, that we need one another, and that the only true solution is to work together.  We need to find common ground, put aside our differences, and work collaboratively to reach the ultimate goal of ending the euthanasia of healthy and treatable companion animals.

7. While we understand that other types of programs and efforts (including adoption, spay and neuter programs, education, cruelty investigations, enforcement of animal control laws and regulations, behavior and training assistance and feral cat management) play a critical role in impacting euthanasia figures, for purposes of this nationwide initiative we have elected to leave these programs in the hands of local organizations and encourage them to continue offering, and expanding upon, these critical services.

8. In order to achieve harmony and forward progress, we encourage each community coalition to discuss language and terminology which has been historically viewed as hurtful or divisive by some animal welfare stakeholders (whether intentional or inadvertent), identify "problem" language, and reach a consensus to modify or phase out language and terminology accordingly.

9. We believe in the importance of transparency and the open sharing of accurate, complete animal-sheltering data and statistics in a manner which is clear to both the animal welfare community and the public.

10. We believe it is essential to utilize a uniform method for collecting and reporting shelter data, in order to promote transparency and better assess the euthanasia rate of healthy and treatable animals. We determined that a uniform method of reporting needs to include the collection and analysis of animal-sheltering data as set forth in the "Animal Statistics Table."  These statistics need to be collected for each individual organization and for the community as a whole and need to be reported to the public annually (e.g., web sites, newsletters, annual reports).  In addition, we determined that each community's "Live Release Rate" needs to be calculated, shared, and reported annually to the public, individually by each organization and jointly by each community coalition.  Both individual organizations and community coalitions should strive for continuous improvement of these numbers. 

11. We developed several standard "definitions" to enable uniform and accurate collection, analysis, and reporting of animal-sheltering data and statistics.  We encourage all communities to adopt the definitions which are set forth in Section III, and implement the principles of these Accords. 

12. While we recognize that many animal welfare organizations provide services to companion animals other than dogs and cats, for purposes of this nationwide initiative we have elected to collect and share data solely as it relates to dogs and cats. 

13. We are committed to continuing dialogue, analysis, and potential modification of this vision as needs change and as progress is made toward achieving our mission.

14. Those involved in the development of the Asilomar Accords have agreed to make a personal commitment to ensure the furtherance of these Accords, and to use their professional influence to bring about a nationwide adoption of this vision.

 

III.  Definitions

(These definitions are not final and are pending refinement from the Asilomar Accords group.)

In order to facilitate the data collection process and assure consistent reporting across agencies, the following definitions have been developed. The Asilomar participants hope that these definitions are applied as a standard for categorizing dogs and cats in each organization. The definitions, however, are not meant to define the outcome for each animal entrusted to our care. A glossary and more specific details and examples are included in the appendix portion of this document. 

Healthy

The term "healthy" means and includes all dogs and cats eight weeks of age or older that, at or subsequent to the time the animal is taken into possession, have manifested no signs of a behavioral or temperamental characteristic that could pose a health or safety risk or otherwise make the animal unsuitable for placement as a pet, and have manifested no sign of disease, injury, a congenital or hereditary condition that adversely affects the health of the animal, or that is likely to adversely affect the animal's health in the future. 

Treatable

The term "treatable" means and includes all dogs and cats who are "rehabilitatable" and all dogs and cats who are "manageable."

- Rehabilitatable: The term "rehabilitatable" means and includes all dogs and cats who are not "healthy," but who are likely to become "healthy," if given medical, foster, behavioral, or other care equivalent to the care typically provided to pets by reasonable and caring pet owners/guardians in the community.

- Manageable: The term "manageable" means and includes all dogs and cats who are not "healthy" and who are not likely to become "healthy," regardless of the care provided; but who would likely maintain a satisfactory quality of life, if given medical, foster, behavioral, or other care, including long-term care, equivalent to the care typically provided to pets by reasonable and caring owners/guardians in the community; provided, however, that the term "manageable" does not include any dog or cat who is determined to pose a significant risk to human health or safety or to the health or safety of other animals.

Unhealthy and Untreatable

The term "unhealthy and untreatable" means and includes all dogs and cats who, at or subsequent to the time they are taken into possession,

(1)  have a behavioral or temperamental characteristic that poses a health or safety risk or otherwise makes the animal unsuitable for placement as a pet, and are not likely to become "healthy" or "treatable" even if provided the care typically provided to pets by reasonable and caring pet owners/guardians in the community; or

(2)  are suffering from a disease, injury, or congenital or hereditary condition that adversely affects the animal's health or is likely to adversely affect the animal's health in the future, and are not likely to become "healthy" or "treatable" even if provided the care typically provided to pets by reasonable and caring pet owners/guardians in the community; or

(3)  are under the age of eight weeks and are not likely to become "healthy" or "treatable," even if provided the care typically provided to pets by reasonable and caring pet owners/guardians in the community.

 

IV.  Annual Animal Statistics Table and Live Release Rate Formulas

This document is available in PDF format.